Metabolomic Analysis of Human Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Molecular changes in HCC development are largely unknown. As the liver plays a fundamental role in the body's metabolism, metabolic changes are to be expected. AIMS: We aimed to identify metabolomic changes in HCC in comparison to liver cirrhosis (LC) patients, which could potentially serve as novel biomarkers for HCC diagnosis and prognosis. METHODS: Metabolite expression from 38 HCC from the SORAMIC trial and 32 LC patients were analyzed by mass spectrometry. Metabolites with significant differences between LC and HCC at baseline were analyzed regarding expression over follow-up. In addition, association with overall survival was tested using univariate Cox proportional-hazard analysis. RESULTS: 41 metabolites showed differential expression between LC and HCC patients. 14 metabolites demonstrated significant changes in HCC patients during follow-up. Campesterol, lysophosphatidylcholine, octadecenoic and octadecadienoic acid, and furoylglycine showed a differential expression in the local ablation vs. palliative care group. High expression of eight metabolites (octadecenoic acid, 2-hydroxybutyrate, myo-inositol, isocitrate, erythronic acid, creatinine, pseudouridine, and erythrol) were associated with poor overall survival. The association between poor OS and octadecenoic acid and creatinine remained statistically significant even after adjusting for tumor burden and LC severity. CONCLUSION: Our findings give promising insides into the metabolic changes during HCC carcinogenesis and provide candidate biomarkers for future studies. Campesterol and furoylglycine in particular were identified as possible biomarkers for HCC progression. Moreover, eight metabolites were detected as predictors for poor overall survival.

Suicide risk after discharge from in-patient psychiatric care: A 15-year retrospective cohort study of individual patient data.

BACKGROUND: Suicide rates are known to be increased in patients after discharge from in-patient psychiatric treatment. However, evidence on risk factors for suicide within this patient group are contradictory. Thus, this study aims to investigate suicide after discharge from a sizeable psychiatric care facility to determine associated risk factors. METHODS: Data on individual patient level from a 15-year single-centre cohort were linked to data from the national death registry and cumulative incidence rates were calculated applying competing risk models. Independent variables included the patients' sex, age at admission, diagnosis, and length of admission. For each of these factors, subdistribution hazards ratios were calculated using a Fine-Gray model. RESULTS: In our sample of 18,425 discharges, when using patients with the diagnosis of substance-use-disorders as a comparator, a significant increase in hazard of post-discharge suicide for male sex (SHR = 1.67;p = 0.037) as well as the discharge diagnoses of affective disorders (SHR = 3.56;p = 0.017) and neurotic stress and somatoform disorders (SHR = 3.73;p = 0.024) were found. Interestingly, the hazard of suicide significantly decreased in more recent discharges (SHR = 0.93;p = 0.006). No statistically significant association of the length of admission with the suicide risk was found (SHR = 0.98;p = 0.834). LIMITATIONS: Suicides may have been mis-identified as natural death in the national death register. CONCLUSION: Male sex and distinct diagnoses were associated with an increased risk for suicide after discharge from a psychiatric care institution. The markedly increased suicide risk within this patient collective highlights the need for the development of tools to assess suicidal behaviour in this group of patients reliably.

[Drug-induced autoimmune-like liver injury]. / Arzneimittelinduzierte immunvermittelte Leberschädigung.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare yet potentially life-threatening disease. Besides intrinsic DILI, which is mainly caused by paracetamol overdosing and which is dose-dependent and predictable, there is idiosyncratic DILI-an unpredictable and dose-independent injury of the liver caused by certain medications that only occurs in a minority of patients taking this drug. The reason why some patients react with DILI towards a specific drug is still unknown. However, the immune system plays a central role, which is underlined by the association of certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphisms and DILI caused by specific drug classes. Due to the immunological processes that lead to the liver injury in DILI, there are great overlaps regarding laboratory and histological parameters between DILI and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Differentiating DILI and AIH can therefore be challenging, especially at the time of presentation. In addition, there are other immunologically mediated DILI phenotypes, in particular the newly defined drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH) and liver injuries caused by checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). DI-ALH is characterized by autoimmune features and good responses towards corticosteroids, with the difference that DI-ALH mostly does not relapse after discontinuation of corticosteroids. CPI-induced liver injury has become more frequent with the rising use of those drugs and is characterized by a distinct histopathological pattern with granulomatous hepatitis and infiltration dominated by cytotoxic T cells. Similarly, the recently recognized liver injury following vaccinations also shows an autoimmune phenotype; however, in contrast to AIH, cytotoxic T cells seem to dominate the inflammatory infiltrates in the liver.

Study design for development of novel safety biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury by the translational safety biomarker pipeline (TransBioLine) consortium: a study protocol for a nested case-control study.

A lack of biomarkers that detect drug-induced liver injury (DILI) accurately continues to hinder early- and late-stage drug development and remains a challenge in clinical practice. The Innovative Medicines Initiative's TransBioLine consortium comprising academic and industry partners is developing a prospective repository of deeply phenotyped cases and controls with biological samples during liver injury progression to facilitate biomarker discovery, evaluation, validation and qualification.In a nested case-control design, patients who meet one of these criteria, alanine transaminase (ALT) ≥ 5 × the upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatase ≥ 2 × ULN or ALT ≥ 3 ULN with total bilirubin > 2 × ULN, are enrolled. After completed clinical investigations, Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment and expert panel review are used to adjudicate episodes as DILI or alternative liver diseases (acute non-DILI controls). Two blood samples are taken: at recruitment and follow-up. Sample size is as follows: 300 cases of DILI and 130 acute non-DILI controls. Additional cross-sectional cohorts (1 visit) are as follows: Healthy volunteers (n = 120), controls with chronic alcohol-related or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (n = 100 each) and patients with psoriasis or rheumatoid arthritis (n = 100, 50 treated with methotrexate) are enrolled. Candidate biomarkers prioritised for evaluation include osteopontin, glutamate dehydrogenase, cytokeratin-18 (full length and caspase cleaved), macrophage-colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor and high mobility group protein B1 as well as bile acids, sphingolipids and microRNAs. The TransBioLine project is enabling biomarker discovery and validation that could improve detection, diagnostic accuracy and prognostication of DILI in premarketing clinical trials and for clinical healthcare application.

Nomenclature, diagnosis and management of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH): An expert opinion meeting report.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can mimic almost all other liver disorders. A phenotype increasingly ascribed to drugs is autoimmune-like hepatitis (ALH). This article summarises the major topics discussed at a joint International Conference held between the Drug-Induced Liver Injury consortium and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. DI-ALH is a liver injury with laboratory and/or histological features that may be indistinguishable from those of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Previous studies have revealed that patients with DI-ALH and those with idiopathic AIH have very similar clinical, biochemical, immunological and histological features. Differentiating DI-ALH from AIH is important as patients with DI-ALH rarely require long-term immunosuppression and the condition often resolves spontaneously after withdrawal of the implicated drug, whereas patients with AIH mostly require long-term immunosuppression. Therefore, revision of the diagnosis on long-term follow-up may be necessary in some cases. More than 40 different drugs including nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, hydralazine, minocycline, infliximab, herbal and dietary supplements (such as Khat and Tinospora cordifolia) have been implicated in DI-ALH. Understanding of DI-ALH is limited by the lack of specific markers of the disease that could allow for a precise diagnosis, while there is similarly no single feature which is diagnostic of AIH. We propose a management algorithm for patients with liver injury and an autoimmune phenotype. There is an urgent need to prospectively evaluate patients with DI-ALH systematically to enable definitive characterisation of this condition.

Medical care of patients with Wilson disease in Germany: a multidisciplinary survey among university centers.

BACKGROUND: Wilson disease (WD) is a rare, hereditary disorder of copper metabolism. Due to its variable symptoms and manifestations, diagnosis remains challenging. Affected patients must obtain lifelong medical treatment, as the disease is fatal if untreated. Patients require continuous monitoring, but little is known about the care of these patients in Germany. Therefore, we analyzed the medical care of WD patients at German university centers. We sent a questionnaire containing 20 questions to a total of 108 departments of pediatrics, neurology and gastroenterology in 36 university hospitals. Our questions referred to the characteristics of WD patients at the different sites and internal procedures regarding diagnosis, therapy and follow-up. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sixty-three departments (58%) returned our questionnaire. In total, approximately one-third of the estimated WD patients in Germany are seen annually in the outpatient clinics of these departments (approx. 950 patients). There are only a few departments which treat patients in a multidisciplinary setting (12%). Our survey revealed that for diagnosis, 51% of all departments used an algorithm based on the Leipzig score as recommended by international guidelines. Most departments apply essential parameters recommended by WD guidelines. Routine monitoring is performed at least biannually by 84% of the departments, and standard investigations for monitoring are regularly applied. A routine family screening is performed by 84% of all departments. A reduction in medical therapy during pregnancy is recommended by 46% of the departments. Only 14% suggested that WD patients should not breastfeed. Liver transplantation (LT) due to WD is a rare but repeatedly occurring event. Most departments of gastroenterology (72%) reported at least one patient with LT within the last decade. CONCLUSIONS: Medical care of WD patients at German university centers follows the recommendations set forth by international guidelines, but only a few centers treat significant numbers of patients. The surveillance of patients does not follow specified standards, but most departments adhere to the accepted guidelines. The formation of central units and networks in a multidisciplinary setting should be evaluated to improve the care of WD patients.

Treating hepatitis D with bulevirtide - Real-world experience from 114 patients.

Background & Aims: Bulevirtide is a first-in-class entry inhibitor of hepatitis B surface antigen. In July 2020, bulevirtide was conditionally approved for the treatment of hepatitis D, the most severe form of viral hepatitis, which frequently causes end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Herein, we report the first data from a large multicenter real-world cohort of patients with hepatitis D treated with bulevirtide at a daily dose of 2 mg without additional interferon. Methods: In a joint effort with 16 hepatological centers, we collected anonymized retrospective data from patients treated with bulevirtide for chronic hepatitis D. Results: Our analysis is based on data from 114 patients, including 59 (52%) with cirrhosis, receiving a total of 4,289 weeks of bulevirtide treatment. A virologic response defined as an HDV RNA decline of at least 2 log or undetectable HDV RNA was observed in 87/114 (76%) cases with a mean time to virologic response of 23 weeks. In 11 cases, a virologic breakthrough (>1 log-increase in HDV RNA after virologic response) was observed. After 24 weeks of treatment, 19/33 patients (58%) had a virologic response, while three patients (9%) did not achieve a 1 log HDV RNA decline. No patient lost hepatitis B surface antigen. Alanine aminotransferase levels improved even in patients not achieving a virologic response, including five patients who had decompensated cirrhosis at the start of treatment. Treatment was well tolerated and there were no reports of drug-related serious adverse events. Conclusions: In conclusion, we confirm the safety and efficacy of bulevirtide monotherapy in a large real-world cohort of patients with hepatitis D treated in Germany. Future studies need to explore the long-term benefits and optimal duration of bulevirtide treatment. Impact and implications: Clinical trials proved the efficacy of bulevirtide for chronic hepatitis D and led to conditional approval by the European Medical Agency. Now it is of great interest to investigate the effects of bulevirtide treatment in a real-world setting. In this work, we included data from 114 patients with chronic hepatitis D who were treated with bulevirtide at 16 German centers. A virologic response was seen in 87/114 cases. After 24 weeks of treatment, only a small proportion of patients did not respond to treatment. At the same time, signs of liver inflammation improved. This observation was independent from changes in hepatitis D viral load. The treatment was generally well tolerated. In the future, it will be of interest to investigate the long-term effects of this new treatment.

Can thiamine substitution restore cognitive function in alcohol use disorder?

AIMS: While clinical consequences of thiamine deficiency in alcohol use disorder (AUD) are severe, evidence-based recommendations on dosage, type of administration and duration of thiamine substitution (TS), and its' target levels remain sparse. This study aimed to compare the effect of two best practice TS regimens on thiamine blood levels (i.e. thiamine pyrophosphate, TPP) and cognitive function. METHODS: In 50 patients undergoing in-patient alcohol-withdrawal treatment, TPP levels were determined at baseline and end of weeks 1, 2 and 8 following administration of oral TS (3 × 100 mg/day for 7 days followed by 1 × 100 mg/day thereafter) either with or without preceding intravenous TS (3 × 100 mg/day for 5 days). An extensive psychiatric assessment was conducted at baseline, including an evaluation of AUD severity and depressive symptoms. Additionally, cognitive function and depressive symptoms were repeatedly evaluated. RESULTS: Relevant increases (mean increase by 100.2 nmol/l [CI 76.5-123.8], P < 0.001) in peripheral blood TPP levels were observed in all patients at the end of weeks 1 and 2. Furthermore, no relevant difference between the intravenous and the oral group was found (average difference between increases: 2.3 nmol/l, P = 0.912). Importantly, an association between the 'extent of the response' to TS and the performance in a memory task was revealed in secondary analyses. CONCLUSION: TS was associated with improving cognitive function in patients with AUD, independently of the substitution regime. Thus, in clinical practice, oral TS might be a sufficient but obligatory medication to prevent cognitive decline in AUD in the absence of Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome.

Tandem mass tag-based quantitative proteomic profiling identifies candidate serum biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury in humans.

Diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and its distinction from other liver diseases are significant challenges in drug development and clinical practice. Here, we identify, confirm, and replicate the biomarker performance characteristics of candidate proteins in patients with DILI at onset (DO; n = 133) and follow-up (n = 120), acute non-DILI at onset (NDO; n = 63) and follow-up (n = 42), and healthy volunteers (HV; n = 104). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for cytoplasmic aconitate hydratase, argininosuccinate synthase, carbamoylphosphate synthase, fumarylacetoacetase, fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) across cohorts achieved near complete separation (range: 0.94-0.99) of DO and HV. In addition, we show that FBP1, alone or in combination with glutathione S-transferase A1 and leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 2, could potentially assist in clinical diagnosis by distinguishing NDO from DO (AUC range: 0.65-0.78), but further technical and clinical validation of these candidate biomarkers is needed.

Relapse and Need for Extended Immunosuppression: Novel Features of Drug-Induced Autoimmune Hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DI-AIH) has been proposed as a distinct phenotype of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), and frequently has been associated with specific drugs, such as minocycline and nitrofurantoin. However, no clear definition of DI-AIH has been established thus far. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify features distinguishing DI-AIH from DILI and idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in an attempt to further define a DI-AIH phenotype. METHOD: A cohort of 38 previously reported DILI and AIH patients who were prospectively recruited at our tertiary centre and who received corticosteroid was analysed regarding the phenotypical presentation and outcome of DI-AIH, DILI, and AIH. RESULTS: AIH (n = 19), DILI (n = 8), and DI-AIH (n = 11) patients presented with similar clinical features at onset, with the only difference being a higher Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) score in the DILI and DI-AIH patients. Post-treatment AIH scores were lower and a more rapid decrease of alanine aminotransferase in the first week of corticosteroid treatment was observed in both DILI groups when compared to AIH patients, while no significant differences were observed between DI-AIH and DILI patients. Relapse occurred in DI-AIH but not in DILI patients (36% vs. 0%) with a more frequent need for long-term immunosuppression (27% vs. 13%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that relapse after cessation of corticosteroids and need for further immunosuppressive treatment does occur in a substantial proportion of DI-AIH patients. However, no other phenotypical differences between DILI due to agents commonly associated with DI-AIH and DILI due to other drugs were identified.

A new framework for advancing in drug-induced liver injury research. The Prospective European DILI Registry.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: No multi-national prospective study of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has originated in Europe. The design of a prospective European DILI registry, clinical features and short-term outcomes of the cases and controls is reported. METHODS: Patients with suspected DILI were prospectively enrolled in the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, Switzerland, Portugal and Iceland, 2016-2021. DILI cases or non-DILI acute liver injury controls following causality assessment were enrolled. RESULTS: Of 446 adjudicated patients, 246 DILI patients and 100 had acute liver injury due to other aetiologies, mostly autoimmune hepatitis (n = 42) and viral hepatitis (n = 34). DILI patients (mean age 56 years), 57% women, 60% with jaundice and 3.6% had pre-existing liver disease. DILI cases and non-DILI acute liver injury controls had similar demographics, clinical features and outcomes. A single agent was implicated in 199 (81%) DILI cases. Amoxicillin-clavulanate, flucloxacillin, atorvastatin, nivolumab/ipilimumab, infliximab and nitrofurantoin were the most commonly implicated drugs. Multiple conventional medications were implicated in 37 (15%) and 18 cases were caused by herbal and dietary supplements. The most common single causative drug classes were antibacterials (40%) and antineoplastic/immunomodulating agents (27%). Overall, 13 (5.3%) had drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis due to nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, infliximab, methylprednisolone and minocycline. Only six (2.4%) DILI patients died (50% had liver-related death), and another six received liver transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: In this first multi-national European prospective DILI Registry study, antibacterials were the most commonly implicated medications, whereas antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents accounted for higher proportion of DILI than previously described. This European initiative provides an important opportunity to advance the study on DILI.

Marked Increase of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase as an Indicator of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients without Conventional Diagnostic Criteria of Acute Liver Injury.

Introduction: Clinically significant drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is defined by elevations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥2 × ULN, or ALT ≥3 × ULN and total bilirubin TBIL >2 × ULN. However, DILI might also occur in patients who do not reach those thresholds and still may benefit from discontinuation of medication. Methods: Fifteen patients recruited for our prospective study on potentially hepatotoxic drugs were included. DILI diagnosis was based on RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) score and expert opinion and was supported by an in vitro test using monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like (MH) cells. Results: Median RUCAM score was 6 (range 4-8), indicating that DILI was possible or probable in all cases. The predominant types of liver injury were mixed (60%) and cholestatic (40%). While no elevation above 2 × ULN of ALP and TBIL was observed, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) above 2 × ULN was identified in 8 of the patients. Six of the 15 patients did not achieve full remission and showed persistent elevation of GGT, which was significantly associated with peak GGT elevation above 2 × ULN (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Here we present a case series of patients with liver enzyme elevation below the conventional thresholds who developed DILI with a predominant GGT elevation leading to drug withdrawal and/or chronic elevation of liver parameters, in particular of GGT. Thus, we propose that DILI should be considered in particular in cases with marked increase of GGT even if conventional DILI threshold levels are not reached, resulting in discontinuation of the causative drug and/or close monitoring of the patients.

Challenges and Future of Drug-Induced Liver Injury Research-Laboratory Tests.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare but potentially severe adverse drug event, which is also a major cause of study cessation and market withdrawal during drug development. Since no acknowledged diagnostic tests are available, DILI diagnosis poses a major challenge both in clinical practice as well as in pharmacovigilance. Differentiation from other liver diseases and the identification of the causative agent in the case of polymedication are the main issues that clinicians and drug developers face in this regard. Thus, efforts have been made to establish diagnostic testing methods and biomarkers in order to safely diagnose DILI and ensure a distinguishment from alternative liver pathologies. This review provides an overview of the diagnostic methods used in differential diagnosis, especially with regards to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DI-AIH), in vitro causality methods using individual blood samples, biomarkers for diagnosis and severity prediction, as well as experimental predictive models utilized in pre-clinical settings during drug development regimes.

Acute liver injury following methylprednisolone pulse therapy: 13 cases from a prospectively collected cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a challenging diagnosis requiring exclusion of other causes of liver injury, concise medical history taking to identify potential causative medication and creation of a plausible temporal relation to attribute said liver injury to a potentially hepatotoxic agent. In spite of corticosteroids being considered an effective treatment for DILI in some patients, methylprednisolone (MPS) has been associated with liver injury of varying severity. METHODS: We analyzed data of our prospective study on potentially hepatotoxic drugs (NCT02353455), identified 13 cases of MPS-associated liver injury and performed an analysis of clinical, laboratory and histopathological characteristics. For all available liver biopsy specimens, expert histopathological analysis was performed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with a variety of primarily neurologic autoimmune diseases treated with MPS developed subsequent liver injury with a median latency of 5 weeks. Liver injury was severe or required transplantation in six patients. Injury typically occurred after repeated pulsing was hepatocellular and responded swiftly to prednisolone administration. For those patients who received in house-follow up, relapse after discontinuation of immunosuppression was not observed. Histopathological features of MPS-DILI comprised both interface and periportal hepatitis with mixed inflammatory infiltrates, similar to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) features. DISCUSSION: MPS-related liver injury can be life-threatening, occurs with considerable latency and after repeat dosing. Regular surveillance of hepatic biochemistry should therefore be routinely performed also after discharge to avoid further MPS-related liver injury during repeat application. Swift response to prednisolone but not histologic features can be helpful to discriminate MPS-DILI from AIH.

Novel predictors for liver transplantation or death in drug-induced acute liver failure.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a leading cause of acute liver failure (ALF). Predictors for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) or death in drug-induced ALF (DI-ALF) are scarce. METHODS: In total 33 of 346 patients recruited for our prospective study on potentially hepatotoxic drugs had ALF. DILI diagnosis was based on Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) score and expert opinion. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, Youden's index and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated to identify the best performing predictive markers and scores for OLT or death. RESULTS: Poor outcome was associated with lower baseline platelet counts and cholinesterase (CHE) levels, higher International Normalized Ratio (INR) levels and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. Yet, AUROC reached a maximum of only 0.71-0.75 for either of those laboratory markers or the MELD score. Notably however, combinations of those scores were highly discriminatory, in particular INR/(CHE*platelet count) and MELD/(CHE*platelet count), showing an AUROC of 0.91, a positive likelihood ratios of 13.78 and a negative likelihood ratios of 0.08. CONCLUSION: While baseline MELD score, INR, CHE, and platelet counts had limited potential to discriminate between DI-ALF with survival or poor outcome, their combinations were highly associated with OLT or death in patients with DI-ALF.

The Psychosocial Burden on Liver Transplant Recipients during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, multiple measures have been implemented including social distancing and curfews. Both the disease and measures might cause stress, particularly in persons at risk, such as liver transplant (LT) recipients. Here, we evaluated the impact on psychosocial well-being of LT recipients. METHODS: Seventy-nine LT recipients and 83 nontransplanted controls participated in this study. Questionnaires comprising the WHO-five well-being index (WHO-5), the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale, and the preliminary COVID-19 Pandemic Mental Health Questionnaire (CoPaQ) were distributed among them. For the WHO-5 and UCLA Loneliness Scale, means of sum scores were compared between both groups, while a comparison on item level was conducted for the CoPaQ. RESULTS: The general well-being was similar in LT recipients and controls (WHO-5: 64.0 ± 20.5% vs. 66.4 ± 17.3%), while the UCLA Loneliness Scale indicated a higher level of perceived social isolation (1.90 ± 0.51 vs. 1.65 ± 0.53, p = 0.001). The CoPaQ indicated higher risk perception regarding health issues, in particular concerning the fear of having severe consequences in case of a COVID-19 infection (3.1 ± 1.1 vs. 2.2 ± 1.3, p < 0.001), higher risk-avoiding behavior and stronger adherence to pandemic measures in LT recipients. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, LT recipients displayed a higher risk perception, a more pronounced risk-avoiding behavior and a higher perception of loneliness, while the overall well-being was comparable to nontransplanted controls.

NMR-Based Lipid Metabolite Profiles to Predict Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Interventional Therapy for a Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): A Substudy of the SORAMIC Trial.

BACKGROUND: This exploratory study aimed to evaluate lipidomic and metabolomic profiles in patients with early and advanced HCCs and to investigate whether certain metabolic parameters may predict the overall survival in these patients. METHODS: A total of 60 patients from the prospective, randomized-controlled, multicenter phase II SORAMIC trial were included in this substudy; among them were 30 patients with an early HCC who underwent radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib or a placebo and 30 patients with an advanced HCC who were treated with a selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) plus sorafenib vs. sorafenib alone. The blood serum of these patients was analyzed using a standardized nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) platform. All tested metabolites were correlated with the overall survival. RESULTS: The overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in patients with an early HCC (median OS: 34.0 months) compared with patients with an advanced HCC (median OS: 12.0 months) (p < 0.0001). Patients with high serum concentrations of myo-inositol (MI) had a higher overall survival compared with patients with low concentrations (21.6 vs. 13.8 months) with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.331 (p = 0.011). Patients with high serum concentrations of dimethylamine had a higher overall survival compared with patients with low concentrations (25.1 vs. 19.7 months) with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.279 (p = 0.034). High concentrations of total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and LDL particles (LDL-P) were associated with a decreased overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: NMR-based lipidomic and metabolomic profiling has the potential to identify individual metabolite biomarkers that predict the outcome of patients with an HCC exposed to non-invasive therapeutic management.